On my way to the Courthouse today for a contempt hearing against the Boston City Council, I stopped by City Hall to see if they took down the meeting posting I have been asking them to take down for a few months. They didn't do it when I asked, nicely, of Feeney, Yoon and Tobin, but file a Motion for Contempt and they jump into action! The meeting notice had been taken town and replaced with another notice that doesn't have a date, place or time and as such is as dubious as the first.
I went to the City Clerk's office to get a copy of the notice. It is always so funny to me how the hired help is so friendly and incredulous about what is going on.
KM: "hi I'd like to get a copy of a meeting notice posted downstairs"
Clerks: "oh you don't need a copy, they are posted online"
KM: "This one isn't"
Clerks "Really?? They are supposed to be. All the postings are online and they tell you the date and time of the meeting"
KM: "Yes, I know they should. But, this one doesn't"
So, they were nice enough to give me a copy of the notice, which contrary to what even the lowly clerks know should be true, ISN'T.
Then I spoke with Rosaria Salerno, who pleasantly told me that "there was no need for that posting to be there".
So, to sum up. Kevin asks nicely for a posting to come down. The City Council refuses until I file a motion for contempt. As soon as I file the motion for contempt, they take the notice down, put up a streamlined version and then the Clerk tells me it doesn't need to be there.
In these belt tightening times, you would think they would have better things to do then put up notices that don't need to be there (and aren't on the website, per city council rules).
BUT, this posting is about the BS on the way to the courthouse...., down one floor at the Mayor's office.
I went to the Mayor's office to ask what he was doing about the apparent violations at the Boston Licensing Board. I was referred to his press office where a nice young man explained to me that he had read the indictment against Dianne Wilkerson, but that the indictment is only about what "Dianne says happened" and is not necessarily true". I tried to point out that the indictment is not about what Dianne says happened, but what the FBI says happened but that seemed to go over his head. I asked whether the Mayor was concerned that the Licensing Board was not conducting business in the proper manner and he assured me that the Licensing Board follows a strenuous process for approving applications. He also let me know, that it is the Governors responsibility for the Board and that the Mayor has nothing to do with it, and hence is not doing any investigations or follow up of the Licensing Board.
He summed up by saying "The Mayor has no influence on the Licensing Board".
Now if you buy that, I have some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.